News
Archives, September 23-30, 2007
Sunday, September 30th, 2007
- U.S.
New-Home Sales Drop, Prices Fall Most Since 1970
NEW YORK (Bloomberg) -- "Sales of new
homes in the U.S.
dropped more than forecast in August and prices plunged by the
most since 1970, pointing to a worsening housing recession that
spells more cutbacks in construction.
Purchases declined 8.3
percent to an annual pace of 795,000,
the lowest level in more than seven years, from a revised 867,000
rate in July, the Commerce Department said today in Washington.
The median price dropped 7.5 percent from August 2006.
The outlook for
residential real estate has dimmed since
borrowing costs jumped and credit restrictions increased last
month on concern over subprime mortgage defaults. The drop in
sales underlines concerns among Federal Reserve officials that
the housing contraction may deepen and slow the economy.
``The bottom is probably
two or three quarters away yet for
housing,'' said John Silvia, chief economist at Wachovia Corp. in
Charlotte, North Carolina, which forecast a decline to 790,000
units. ``It seems like the credit restrictions did hit much
harder than people expected.''
Economists forecast sales
would fall to an 825,000 pace from
a previously reported 870,000 in July, based on the median
estimate of 72 forecasts in a Bloomberg News survey. Predictions
ranged from 730,000 to 870,000. Compared with a year earlier,
purchases were down 21 percent.
GDP Revision
The economy grew in the
second quarter at a revised 3.8
percent annual pace, the most in more than a year, a separate
Commerce report today showed. The gain compares with a previous
estimate of 4 percent and a 0.6 percent increase in the first
three months of the year. The figures didn't reflect last month's
credit-market turmoil which heightened concern the expansion
might be cut short.
The number of workers
filing first-time jobless claims
unexpectedly fell last week to a four-month low of 298,000, a
report from the Labor Department also showed. The decline may
help allay concerns about a weakening labor market.
U.S. Treasury securities
were little changed following the
reports and stock prices held gains. The yield on the benchmark
10-year note was 4.60 at 10:07 a.m. in New York, compared with
4.62 percent late yesterday.
The number of homes for
sale at the end of the month fell
1.5 percent to 529,000 in August. With sales dropping more than
five times as much, the inventory of unsold homes jumped to 8.2
months at the current sales pace.
The number of properties completed
and waiting to be sold
rose by 2,000 to 180,000..."
More:
The
turning point
The
Bottom Line: Buckle up, the road ahead is going to get
very bumpy.
- Iran's Parliment Signs Resolution
to Label CIA, Army as 'Terrorist Organizations'
TEHRAN, Iran
(Fox) — "Iran's parliament on
Saturday approved a nonbinding resolution labeling the CIA and the U.S.
Army "terrorist organizations," in apparent response to a Senate
resolution seeking to give a similar designation to Iran's Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps.
The
hard-line dominated parliament cited U.S. involvement in dropping
nuclear bombs in Japan in World War II, using depleted uranium
munitions in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Iraq, supporting the killings
of Palestinians by Israel, bombing and killing Iraqi civilians, and
torturing terror suspects in prisons.
"The
aggressor U.S. Army and the Central Intelligence Agency are terrorists
and also nurture terror," said a statement by the 215 lawmakers who
signed the resolution at an open session of the Iranian parliament. The
session was broadcast live on state-run radio.
The
resolution, which is seen as a diplomatic offensive against the U.S.,
urges Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government to treat the
two as terrorist organizations. It also paves the way for the
resolution to become legislation that — if ratified by the country's
hardline constitutional watchdog — would become law.
The
government is expected to wait for U.S. reaction before making its
decision. In Washington, the White House declined to comment
Saturday..."
More:
Iran's
parliament votes to label CIA, U.S. Army 'terrorist' groups
The
Bottom Line: "I'm rubber and you're glue!...".
- Large earthquake near Guam
TOKYO (Reuters) - "A strong
earthquake with an estimated magnitude of
7.1 hit near the U.S. Pacific territory of Guam on Sunday, Japan's
Meteorological Agency said, but island media said there were no
immediate reports of injuries.
Guam's Pacific Daily News
said the quake could be felt in high-rise
buildings on the island, which is home to a major U.S. military base.
The quake, at a depth of
30 km, occurred at 11:09 a.m. Japan time
near the island, the Japanese government agency said on its Web site
(www.jma.go.jp/en/quake).
The U.S. Geological
Survey also recorded a quake in the same area,
which it said on its Web site (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter)
was
of magnitude 6.8 and centered about 345 km (215 miles) south-southeast
of Guam.
Agencies
said they were on the alert for a possible tsunami, but the Pacific
Tsunami Warning Centre said one was not expected..."
The
Bottom Line: Activity is up.
Saturday, September 29th, 2007
- Dollar Hits
Another Low Against Euro
NEW YORK (AP) -- The U.S. dollar
dropped to a record low against the
euro for a sixth consecutive session Thursday, sagging under
expectations of a U.S. Federal Reserve rate cut next month.
The
dollar has skidded to new lows against the European currency since the
Fed last week cut interest rates by a larger-than-expected half
percentage point.
The fresh low on Thursday
came as market expectations build for
another rate cut by the Fed amid more signs the U.S. economy is in a
funk. And some think the greenback is likely to remain in a swoon until
the economy stops weakening.
Thursday's disappointing
economic
data included a sharp drop in new homes sales for August. It followed
other discouraging reports released this week that could prompt the
central bank to further cut rates when it meets next month.
Lower
interest rates, used to jump-start an economy, can weaken a currency as
investors transfer funds to countries where their deposits and
fixed-income investments bring higher returns.
With so many
warnings signs of a weakening economy, the dollar will be hard-pressed
to eke out a rebound, said Michael Woolfolk, senior currency strategist
at the Bank of New York.
"We're going to have to
live with a
sagging dollar in the foreseeable future, until the U.S. economy gets
back on its feet," he said.
The euro rose as high as
$1.4189
Thursday, breaking its previous record of $1.4162 from early Wednesday.
It later retreated to $1.4160 in late New York trading, up from $1.4136
late Wednesday.
The Commerce Department
reported Thursday that
sales of new homes tumbled 8.3 percent in August to the lowest level in
seven years, a stark sign that the credit crisis, triggered by bad U.S.
mortgages, is aggravating an already painful housing slump..."
More:
From
Prime to Subprime, America's Home-Mortgage Meltdown Has Just Begun
5 Reasons Why We Are Closer to a Recession
Former US
Treasury Secretary Says 50 Percent Chance of US Recession
Investors
to Fed: Thanks for nothing
Reports
pain cloudy jobs picture
Forecasts
lose shine as credit crunch fuels doubt
The
Bottom Line: What's with all this talk about a
"recession"? That started over a year ago. Now we're
dipping down into "depression" territory.
- Russia promises retaliation if
weapons deployed in space
MOSCOW (RIA Novosti) - "Russia is
ready to take
appropriate measures if weapons are deployed in space, the commander of
the Russian Space Forces said Thursday.
"Should any country
deploy weapons in space, then the laws of armed
warfare are such that retaliatory weapons are certain to appear," Col.
Gen. Vladimir Popovkin said.
He said Russia and China
have drafted an international declaration on
the non-deployment of weapons in space and sent it to the UN.
"It is necessary to
establish the rules of the game in space," he said,
adding that the deployment of weapons in space could have unpredictable
consequences, since such weapons are "very complex systems."
"A sizable war could
break out," the commander said.
He said space must not be
the sphere of interests of any one country.
"We do not want to fight
in space, and we do not want to call the shots
there either, but we will not permit any other country to do so," he
said.
Popovkin also said that
Russia has an integrated missile attack warning system, covering the
country's entire territory..."
The
Bottom Line: The Ruskies are getting downright awnry.
- Is Belgium breaking up?
New York
(worldnetdaily.com) -- "
All politics are local, said "Tip" O'Neill.
Not so. It is more true
to say that all politics are tribal.
For
the 1991 prediction of Arthur Schlesinger – "Ethnic and
racial conflict, it now seems evident, will soon replace the conflict
of ideologies as the explosive issue of our time" – has proven
prophetic.
As
Schlesinger was writing, the Soviet Union, a prison house of
nations held together by the ideology of Marxism-Leninism, the Red
Army, the KGB and the Communist Party, was disintegrating. Out of its
carcass came 15 nations. Causes of secession: ethnicity and culture.
At
the same time, Yugoslavia crumbled. Slovenes and Croats
broke free of Belgrade, and Bosnia was beset by a civil-sectarian war
of Croats, Serbs and Muslims. Macedonia seceded, then Montenegro. Now
Kosovo, cradle of the Orthodox Serb people, but 90 percent Albanian and
Muslim, is moving toward secession.
Yugoslavia,
Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union came apart,
after becoming free, confirming what my late friend Sam Francis said:
Multiracial, multiethnic, multilingual countries are held together
either by an authoritarian regime or an ethnocultural core – as the
English have held the United Kingdom together – or they come apart.
Today,
we see agitation for secession by
Scottish nationalists who wish to follow the Irish nationalists of the
early 20th century out of the United Kingdom. Which bring us to the
point of this column.
Belgium,
created by the European powers in 1831, is the likely
next nation in Europe to break up – into a Dutch-speaking Flanders in
the north, tied to Holland by language and culture, and a Francophone
south, Wallonia, tied to France by language and culture.
What
puts the breakup of Belgium on the front burner is that
this nation of 10 million has been without a government for three
months. In June, Yves Leterme, the leader of the Flemish Christian
Democrats, won the general election, but was blocked from forming a
government by Wallonia, which fears Leterme is a closet nationalist
bent on secession.
Belgium
is also divided economically and politically. Flanders
is wealthy, conservative, capitalist. Wallonia is poor, socialist,
statist. As the Flemish 60 percent of the population generates 70
percent of GDP and 80 percent of all exports, it is weary of seeing its
taxes – the top rate is 50 percent – going to sustain a socialist
Wallonia where unemployment is 15 percent. By one poll, 43 percent of
Flemish wish to quit Belgium and go their own way.
What
enables Wallonia to block formation of a government is a
parliamentary system where Flanders and Wallonia must each assent to
any government – which means that half of the Walloons, 20 percent of
Belgium's population, holds veto power over a national government.
Not
only is the parliamentary situation becoming intolerable to
Flanders, there is rage over the recent socialist government's having
brought in French-speaking North Africans to give Walloons control of
Brussels, which, though in Flanders, has a French-speaking majority.
Heightening
the tensions, on Sept. 11, a demonstration was held
in Brussels to protest "the Islamization of Europe," featuring a moment
of silence for the victims of 9/11. There, as Washington Times
columnist Diana West describes the videotape, "we see black-clad
Belgian policemen brutalizing a man in a light-colored suit and tie.
His hands are cuffed behind his back, his right elbow is clasped in
what is known as an arm-bar hold, and he is being subjected to a
genital hold – a vicious grip that, a retired cop friend of mine tells
me, would get any American policeman thrown off the force."
The
victim of this police brutality was Frank Vanhecke,
president of the Flemish secessionist party Vlams Belang and a member
of the European Parliament. Also arrested and beaten was Filip
Dewinter, the leading politician of Vlams Belang, which is Belgium's
largest opposition party. This is like having Mitch McConnell beaten up
and arrested at a rally on the Washington Mall to protest illegal
immigration.
Seemingly
condoning what was done to the Vlams Belang leaders,
Terry Davis, the secretary general of the Council of Europe, issued a
statement declaring, "The freedom of expression and freedom of assembly
are indeed preconditions for democracy, but they should not be regarded
as a license to offend."
Are
offensive ideas and speech now verboten in the European Union?
While
European and U.S. leftists regard Dewinter, Vanhecke and
Vlams Belang as crypto-fascist, as West writes, it was the police
conduct that might better be described as "The New Face of Fascism" in
Europe. Moreover, West and I have met both men, and neither was wearing
jackboots. What they seek is what many Americans seek: the preservation
of their country and their unique national identity.
If
a party of small-government immigration reformers and
defenders of Europe's unique culture, heritage and identity can be
subjected to such treatment by Belgian police and Europe's elite, we
have to ask: Just how democratic is this new European Union, when its
own ideology of multiculturalism is challenged by the people in whose
name it presumes to speak?
Has
the European Union become an enemy of the people it rules?.."
The
Bottom Line: The world is definately drawing nearer to
something we don't want.
Friday, September 28th, 2007
- U.S.
dollar slides, but intervention unlikely
NEW YORK/LONDON (Reuters) - "Central
banks are not quite ready to
prop up a weakening U.S. dollar, but that could change if inflation
rises, investors shun U.S. assets and a sluggish U.S. economy starts to
drag world economic growth down.
As long as it doesn't
happen too fast, a dollar decline is exactly
what Washington is after because it boosts U.S. exports and narrows the
country's massive current account deficit.
Also, intervention in
currency markets would undermine U.S. efforts
to get China to float its currency, the yuan, more freely, thereby
addressing the global imbalance between nations running huge trade and
current account deficits and surpluses.
"There's probably
agreement right now that a dollar decline is not
such a bad thing, given the trade imbalances and the weakness of the
U.S. economy relative to the rest of the world," said Tony Crescenzi,
chief bond market strategist at Miller, Tabak & Co. in New York.
"So I don't see the urgency for intervention right now."
The dollar tumbled to a
record low against the euro for the sixth
straight day on Thursday, and hit an all-time low against a basket of
major currencies.
The latest dollar slide
was triggered when the Federal Reserve cut
interest rates last week to boost an economy starting to groan beneath
the weight of a worsening U.S. housing slump and a credit squeeze
sparked by losses on risky U.S. mortgages.
Since early 2006, the
euro has climbed from $1.18 to just shy of
$1.42 as dealers priced in prospects for slower U.S. economic growth.
Of
course, given the dollar has fallen nearly 4.0 percent versus the
euro this month alone, and the possibility of a currency discussion at
next month's meeting of leaders from the Group of Seven wealthiest
nations, talk of intervention has increased in markets..."
More:
KB
Home sales plunge as housing market worsens
Dollar stays near record low vs euro
Congress
agrees to raise U.S. credit limit
Mortgage
crash hits new home sales
Freeie
Mac chief warns of recession
Only
£ 4.4m left to protect UK's bank deposits
Dollar
parity puts squeeze on Canadian retailers
The
Bottom Line: The people of a nation are expected to
maintain fiscal responsibility, but I guess our governments do not lead
by example. What a bunch of buffoons.
- Oil tops $83, eyes new high as
funds pile in
SINGAPORE
(Reuters) - "Oil extended gains for a third day on Friday
to above $83 a barrel, nearing its record high as a weak dollar and
pre-winter supply worries fuelled fund buying.
U.S. crude for November
delivery rose 30 cents to $83.18 a barrel by
9:45 p.m. EDT, after gaining $2.58 or 3.24 percent in the previous
session. Oil was recovering from a profit-taking dip earlier this week
that pulled prices off their $83.90 peak.
London Brent crude rose
30 cents to $80.33 a barrel.
"On a macro level people
are clearly buying crude oil as a hedge
against a weaker dollar. The crude market is structually very solid,"
said a hedge fund manager based in Asia.
The dollar hit an
all-time low against a basket of currencies on
Thursday on concerns over a slowdown in the U.S. housing sector. The
weak dollar, which can strengthen the nominal values of commodities
traded in the currency, also boosted metals.
The return of a
backwardated structure in the crude market -- in
which prompt oil is more expensive than oil further in the future -- is
also drawing more investors who can profit by rolling long positions
from one month to the next.
The premium of
front-month U.S. crude to the second month last week
rose to above $1.50, the highest since early 2003, just before a wave
of long-term investors ploughed over $100 billion into commodity
markets. It was at $1.40 on Friday.
"Right
now many speculators and investors are looking into the
energy market, lots of new money is pouring into energy funds," said
Kentaro Obata, Tokyo-based trading director at Astmax..."
More:
Lorenzo
Strengthens to Hurricane Off Mexico's Gulf Coast
The
Bottom Line: With oil prices seen hitting the ionosphere,
who knows where it will go from there.
- What World War III May Look Like
Location Unknown
(antiwar.com) -- "Neoconservatives are great observers of war
and warriors, though they are sometimes not in complete agreement about
the numbering of the conflicts that they send other people's sons and
daughters to fight. Norman Podhoretz, the patriarch of the neocons,
believes that the Cold War was World War III and that the U.S. is now
fighting World War IV against "Islamofascism." He intends to expand
World War IV by slating Iran as the next domino to fall to America's
military might. Podhoretz undoubtedly sees the current global conflict
as something that is good and necessary, both containable and winnable,
but as his judgment on Iraq was fallible, his prediction of Iran's
rapid destruction is also unreliable. It might be useful to imagine
just how war with Iran could play out if the Iranians don't roll over
and surrender at the first whiff of grapeshot.
It might start with a
minor incident, possibly involving an American Marine patrol operating
out of the new base at Badrah near the Iranian border. The Marines are
surrounded by superior Iranian forces claiming that the Americans have
strayed inside Iranian territory. The Marines refuse to surrender their
weapons and instead open fire. The Iranians respond. Helicopter
gunships are called in to support the Marines, and artillery fire is
directed against Iranian military targets close to the border.
President Bush calls the incident an act of war and, in an emotional
speech to the nation, orders U.S. forces to attack. A hastily called
meeting of the UN Security Council results in a 17-1 vote urging the
United States to exercise restraint, with only Washington voting "no."
In the UN General Assembly, only the U.S., Israel, Micronesia, and
Costa Rica support the military action. The U.S. is effectively alone.
In the first few days,
overwhelming American air and naval superiority destroy Iran's
principal air, naval, and army bases. Iranian Revolutionary Guard
facilities are particularly targeted and are obliterated, as are the
known Iranian nuclear research and development sites. Population
centers are avoided, though smart weapons destroy communications
centers and command and control facilities. There are nevertheless
large numbers of civilian casualties and widespread radioactive
contamination as many of the targeted sites are in or near cities.
Infrastructure is also hit, particularly bridges, roads, and power
generation stations close to known nuclear research centers and
military sites. The U.S. media, which had supported the
administration's plans to engage Iran, rallies around the flag,
praising the surgical attacks designed to cripple Tehran's nuclear
weapons program. Congress supports the bombing, with leaders from both
parties praising the president and commenting that Iran had it coming.
The Pentagon and White
House call the attacks a complete success, but Iran strikes back. With
five years to prepare, Iran has successfully hidden and hardened many
of its military and nuclear facilities, a large percentage of which are
undamaged. The aircraft carrier USS Eisenhower operating in the Persian
Gulf is hit by a Chinese Silkworm cruise missile and grounds itself in
shallow water to avoid sinking. Three other support vessels are also
hit and severely damaged when they are attacked by small craft manned
by suicide bombers. Pro-Iranian riots break out in Beirut, where the
government is forced to call in soldiers to shoot at the crowds. In the
south of Lebanon, Hezbollah fires salvoes of rockets into Israel.
Israel responds by bombing Lebanon and Syria, which it blames for the
attacks. Iranian Shahab-3 missiles also strike Israel, killing a number
of civilians. The Israeli Defense Forces are mobilized, and troops are
sent to the northern border. Syria and Lebanon also mobilize their
forces. Rioters in Baghdad attack US. .troops and the American embassy
and are driven back only after the soldiers open fire and call in
helicopter gunships. Snipers attack American soldiers all over Iraq.
Shi'ites sympathetic to Iran sabotage Saudi Arabia's eastern oil
fields. The Saudi fields suffer some damage, and hundreds of alleged
saboteurs are shot dead by Saudi security forces. An oil tanker out of
Kuwait is hit by a Silkworm close to the Straits of Hormuz and runs
aground. Another hits a mine planted by Iran. Insurers in London refuse
to cover any tankers transiting the Persian Gulf. Oil shipments from
the region, one quarter of the world supply, stop completely, and oil
goes up to $200 a barrel. Wall Street suffers its biggest loss in 20
years, with the Dow Jones index plummeting by more than 800 points.
The U.S. offers Iran a
cease-fire, which Tehran rejects. Two days later, President Hamid
Karzai of Afghanistan is assassinated under orders from Tehran. Fearing
that he will be next, Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf flees to
Dubai. Order breaks down in both countries. The Pakistani army declares
a state of emergency. Several leaders in the Pakistani tribal areas
that are sheltering Osama bin Laden declare themselves independent.
Fighting increases in Iraq with U.S. soldiers being targeted by both
leading Shi'ite militias. U.S. troops evacuate Baghdad, fighting their
way out with heavy casualties. There are reports of Iranian soldiers
and militiamen massing at the border. Rioters in Basra succeed in
cutting the main roads leading to Kuwait that supply U.S. forces.
The U.S. scrambles to
contain the damage, pressuring the Pakistani army to put down the riots
and secure the country's nuclear arsenal, while at the same time trying
to restore order in Kabul through the multinational force. Several NATO
allies balk at using their soldiers in what they see as a burgeoning
civil war, and the U.S. suffers heavy losses in street fighting before
withdrawing to its bases. Taliban-backed militias take over much of
Kabul and Kandahar. Afghanistan's Mazar-i-Sharif, which is largely
Shi'ite, declares itself part of Iran. Waves of Iranian soldiers and
militiamen cross the border into Iraq, where they are welcomed by the
Iraqi militias. U.S. troops are under siege countrywide and are forced
to withdraw into their bases where they can be supplied by air. The
Iraqi government resigns and is replaced by a group of Shi'ite clerics.
The government in Lebanon falls and is replaced by a coalition headed
by Hezbollah. A salvo of Iranian Silkworm missiles sets the Saudi
Arabian eastern oil fields ablaze. Saudi Arabia sends an urgent message
to Tehran declaring that it is "neutral" in the fighting and will not
assist the U.S. in any way. Kuwait sends the same message, as does
Egypt. Kuwait refuses to allow the U.S. to use its men and supplies at
Camp Doha against Iran. In Bahrain, rampaging Shi'ite crowds depose
Sheik Khalifa al-Khalifa and set up an Islamic Republic which
immediately demands that the U.S. Fifth Fleet dismantle its
headquarters and go home. The Dow Jones index loses another 1,000
points.
The U.S. attempts to get
China and Russia to mediate with Iran to end the fighting, but they
refuse to do Washington any favors, noting that they had opposed the
attack in the first place. Suicide bombers attack London, Washington,
New York, and Los Angeles. The attacks are poorly planned and inflict
only a few casualties, but panic sets in and the public demands that
the respective governments do something. The U.S. tells the Iranian
government that unless resistance ceases, nuclear weapons will be used
on select targets. India and Pakistan are alarmed by the U.S. threat
and put their own nuclear forces on high alert, as does Israel. Russia
and China also increase their readiness levels to respond to the crisis.
Iran refuses to concede
defeat, and the Iranian people rally around the government. The U.S.
public clamors for action. Oil prices continue to surge, and even the
long term viability of petroleum supplies is in question as the Straits
of Hormuz continue to be closed. Another U.S. ship is sunk by suicide
attackers in the Persian Gulf. U.S. troops are under fire nearly
everywhere in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Anti-American rioting takes
place in Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur, and Dhaka. The U.S. consulate general
in Karachi, Pakistan, is overrun and sacked. Forty Americans are
killed, along with hundreds of Pakistanis. The Pakistani army announces
that it can no longer protect Americans. There are frequent terrorism
scares in a number of American cities, which are under red alert
security lockdown, though there are no new attacks. As a preventive
measure, Muslim leaders and some antiwar activists are arrested and
detained at military prisons, including Guantanamo. Israel continues to
be bombarded from inside Lebanon and Syria. Its air attacks on targets
in both countries inflict major damage on civilians but are
unsuccessful in stopping the rockets. Rioting rocks the West Bank and
Gaza. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas flees to Cairo. India
threatens to attack Pakistan if there is any question about the
security of Islamabad's nuclear arsenal.
The United States uses a
neutron-type bomb against the main Iranian nuclear research center at
Natanz, which it had already bombed conventionally and destroyed. It
vows to bomb again if Iran continues to resist. Iran is defiant and
fires another wave of Silkworms at U.S. ships, sinking one. Suicide
bombers hit U.S. targets in Iraq and Afghanistan. Russia and China
place their nuclear forces on high alert. Pakistani militants take over
parliament, aided by radical elements in the army and the intelligence
service. India launches a preemptive strike against the main Pakistani
nuclear centers at Wah and Multan, where the country's arsenal is
believed to be concentrated. Pakistan has hidden some of its nukes
elsewhere, however, and is able to strike back by bombing New Delhi.
World War III has begun..."
More:
Overpopulation
could be people, planet problem
Superbug plans
'ignore' evidence
The
Bottom Line: I hate to hypothesize situations that may
take place in the future, but some scenarios are far more realistic
than others; this is one of them.
Thursday, September 27th, 2007
- Subprime:
Bilk talk, little help
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- "The
bullhorn message from the government
to mortgage lenders has been: Bend. Do what you can to help struggling
homeowners.
The message to troubled
homeowners has been: Call your lender. You may be able to work
something out.
Despite the persistent
blare, there is not a whole lotta "loan modifying" going on yet.
A
survey by Moody's found that most subprime-loan servicers this year had
modified only about 1 percent of their adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs)
that had reset to higher rates by the end of July. Servicers, which may
or may not be the original lender, collect mortgage payments and deal
with defaults and foreclosures.
At the Consumer Credit
Counseling
Service (CCCS) of San Francisco, which has been working with borrowers
referred by lenders, a loan modification is the rare exception rather
than the rule.
In a modification, a loan
servicer could, for
instance, freeze the loan's introductory rate for 24 months or fix that
rate for the remainder of the loan.
But based on what the
credit counselors have seen from lenders' responses, "if a borrower is
behind because of the rate hike, in general that is not enough of a
reason to modify the loan. The borrower needs to have a reason [e.g.,
losing one's income or a medical crisis] and proof they can make the
modified payment," said Erica J. Sandberg, CCCS of San Francisco's
financial education and communications advisor.
And lenders are not
likely to even consider a modification unless a borrower is already
behind in their payments, Sandberg said.
There
are competing reasons for why modifications are few and far between,
and they don't necessarily speak to willful refusal on the part of
lenders and servicers.
Swamped lenders.
Lenders have been
bombarded with requests for modifications and aren't adequately staffed
to handle them, according to Mortgage Bankers Association spokesman
John Mechem, who added that lenders are in the process of hiring more
people.
Borrowers in too deep.
Loan modifications don't
make sense for some borrowers since they've already had trouble
handling their mortgages before their rates reset higher. In those
cases, Sandberg said, modifications "just stretch out the problem."
For
those borrowers, a credit counselor might recommend they ask their bank
to agree to a short sale in which the bank will forgive the debt not
covered by the sale of their home. Or they might pursue a
deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure - whereby they sign over the deed of their
house to the lender and walk away without further obligation. If they
choose this option, they may be able to minimize damage to their credit
if they ask the lender to remove the negative reference on their credit
report, according to legal information publisher NOLO.
The "Mother, may I?"
factor.
Servicers who get loans in securitized bundles - say 3,000 to 5,000
loans per deal - may be restricted in how many loans they may modify
without seeking the permission of investors in those securities, said
Larry Litton, president of Litton Loan Servicing. A 5 percent cap on
the amount of loans that may be modified is typical.
What's more, the
servicers' contracts with investors may have rules governing when
modifications may be made.
The "Are you my
mother?" factor.
Sometimes no one knows who to ask for permission to modify a loan. "The
loans have been sliced and diced so many times, that the owners cannot
be found," said Center for Responsible Lending senior vice president
Eric Stein, in written Congressional testimony delivered this week.
No-shows.
There has been a push by lenders to contact at-risk borrowers earlier
and more frequently. But the borrowers are hesitant. Litton said that
for every six letters he sends to at-risk borrowers, he might get one
response.
In some cases, if borrowers overstated
their income on
their original loan application to buy more home than they could
afford, they're reluctant to admit that to the servicer since lying on
a loan is illegal, said Allen Hardester, a mortgage consultant in
Maryland..."
More:
Has the Fed Lost
Control Over Money?
The Second Great Depression
US
economy kills American middle class
The
Era of Global Financial Instability
Dollar
still on downward trend
Subprime
Panic Freezes $40 Billion of Canadian Commercial Paper
Dollar
Trades Near Record Low Against Euro Before Durable Goods
The
Bottom Line: All of this lending, borrowing and selling of
debt is truly giving me a headache.
- Oil prices seen surging to record
level next year
LONDON (Reuters) - "Tight oil
supplies, red-hot global demand and a
weakening dollar will boost average oil prices to a record level next
year, a Reuters poll showed on Wednesday.
Analysts raised their
average 2008 oil price forecast for U.S. crude to $67 a barrel as many
believe the current rally will continue well
into next year. The forecast surpasses the record average of $66.24,
reached in 2006.
"Behind the market
tightening, we see global oil demand accelerating
in the second half of this year and maintaining strong momentum through
early 2008," said independent analyst Geoff Pyne of Enerpyltd.com.
Falling U.S. crude
stocks, concern about storm damage to Gulf of
Mexico oil installations, a half-point cut in key U.S. interest rates
and a weak dollar have pushed oil to a record $83.90 a barrel this
month.
Analysts forecast oil
prices to finish strong this year with U.S.
crude averaging $69.82 in the fourth quarter. The average 2007 oil
price is estimated at $66.07, slightly lower than last year due to the
market's brief dip below $50 in January.
"For the balance of this
year, we do not see much downside given
current OPEC production trends," said Harry Tchilinguirian, senior oil
analyst at BNP Paribas.
"And the usual
geopolitical suspects -- Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, Venezuela -- will feature
again prominently next year," he added.
The
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries pledged this
month to raise oil output by 500,000 barrels per day from November 1,
but the move did little to soothe consumer concerns that supplies may
run thin this winter..."
More:
Oil
spikes above $81, Mexico storm worries brew
The
Bottom Line: Get out your spikes and feathers, it'll be
Mad Max in no time! But seriously, this sucks.
- Sources: Staged cyber attack
reveals vulnerability in power grid
WASHINGTON
(CNN) -- "Researchers who launched an experimental
cyber attack caused a generator to self-destruct, alarming the federal
government and electrical industry about what might happen if such an
attack were carried out on a larger scale, CNN has learned.
Sources familiar with the
experiment said the same attack scenario
could be used against huge generators that produce the country's
electric power.
Some experts fear bigger,
coordinated attacks
could cause widespread damage to electric infrastructure that could
take months to fix.
CNN has honored a request
from the Department of Homeland Security
not to divulge certain details about the experiment, dubbed "Aurora,"
and conducted in March at the Department of Energy's Idaho lab
In a previously
classified video of the test CNN obtained, the generator shakes and
smokes, and then stops.
DHS acknowledged the experiment involved
controlled hacking into a
replica of a power plant's control system. Sources familiar with the
test said researchers changed the operating cycle of the generator,
sending it out of control.
The White House was briefed on the
experiment, and DHS officials
said they have since been working with the electric industry to devise
a way to thwart such an attack.
"I can't say it [the
vulnerability] has been eliminated. But I can say a lot of risk has
been taken off the table," said Robert Jamison, acting undersecretary
of DHS's National Protection and Programs Directorate.
Government sources said
changes are being made to both computer
software and physical hardware to protect power generating equipment.
And the Nuclear Regulatory Commission said it is conducting inspections
to ensure all nuclear plants have made the fix.
Industry experts also said
the experiment shows large electric systems are vulnerable in ways not
previously demonstrated..."
More:
Government video shows
mock hacker attack
The
Bottom Line: When the power goes out, and doesn't come
back on, then we will truly enter another dark ages.
Wednesday, September 26th, 2007
- Long
GM strike would threaten economy
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - "A strike
against General Motors Corp will
likely skew crucial data for assessing the impact of a housing slump
and credit squeeze, but the degree of danger the walkout poses to the
U.S. economy depends on how long it drags on.
The automaker and the
United Auto Workers resumed contract talks on
Monday afternoon, just hours after the union called the strike. For
auto-industry analysts, that was a sign the two sides could quickly
resolve disagreements over job security and benefits.
If a settlement comes in
a matter of days, rather than months, the economy would probably suffer
little damage, economists say.
But a protracted work
stoppage could prove disastrous with a housing
downturn and credit market unrest already threatening to stall an
expansion now in its sixth year.
"If the strike lasts a
month or longer, it could take 1 percentage
point off of real GDP (gross domestic product) in the fourth quarter,
or more, even if activity ramps back up in December," Merrill Lynch
analyst David Rosenberg said.
That would be a
significant blow considering economists were
forecasting a slim 2.1 percent gain in real fourth-quarter GDP,
according to the Blue Chip consensus forecast.
"Lost income can also
have a negative impact on consumer outlays in
the months after the strike resolution since the income lost during a
strike is gone permanently," Rosenberg said.
The
73,000-strong UAW walked out on Monday in the first national strike
against GM since 1970..."
More:
Further price
drop for US homes
Despite Fed cuts, mortgage rates rise
Dollar
falls versus euro ahead of housing data
Home sales, prices
continue to fall
S&P:
US Home Price Decline Accelerates
The
Bottom Line: Always something new.
- China Builds World's Largest Navy
Beijing
(newswithviews.com) - "Did
you know that China could become the world’s leading naval power by
2020? That’s the verdict of military analyst Tony Corn. This may help
explain why the U.S. Navy thinks a piece of paper called the U.N. Law
of the Sea Treaty provides some sort of protection for American forces
on the high seas. It offers no such protection, of course, but it
creates the impression that Navy leaders are doing something about our
increasing weakness and vulnerability. However, like so many other U.N.
treaties, including the 19 anti-terrorism treaties in effect on 9/11,
this one offers a false sense of security. It will mask a dramatic
decline in our military power.
The U.N. Convention on the Law of the
Sea (UNCLOS) will be the
subject of a September 27 hearing before Senator Joe Biden’s Foreign
Relations Committee. All of the witnesses are pro-treaty. Another
hearing is scheduled to follow and a quick Senate vote on the pact is
then predicted. This process is better known as a railroad. Like the
illegal alien amnesty bill, our Senate leaders, in cahoots with Bush
Administration officials, are trying to rush it through. It remains to
be seen whether the American people will wake up in time. Can we count
on the media to blow the whistle? The betting here is that talk radio
and the Internet will have to carry the load.
Before the
Senate rushes into an embrace of this treaty, it might be advisable for
our media to tell the complete story of the decline of the U.S. Navy
and attempt to explain how and why this has happened. But that would
require that major news organizations pay less attention to O.J. and
Britney. And that may be too much to ask.
Corn explains
what is happening right before our eyes. “Though globalization has
increased the importance of maritime affairs, there has been both a
relative and an absolute decline of U.S. sea power, with a U.S. Navy
today at its lowest level in the post-World War II era,” he notes. “For
the first time in 20 years, the U.S. is in the process of drafting a
new maritime strategy, but with a considerably reduced force that went
from 600 to fewer than 300 ships, and with new responsibilities in
terms of nonmilitary maritime security. Hence the concept of the
Thousand Ship Navy, which is meant to create a global maritime
partnership with foreign navies.”
According to
the Navy’s June 2007 Playbook, this 1,000-ship Navy is one that
traverses the high seas under “hundreds of flags.” This plan depends on
using foreign Navies, which are called “partner countries,” for our
defense. Perhaps a U.N. Navy will even be involved. The Playbook
declares, “A groundswell of support from military leaders around the
world has allowed us to move forward with this concept and make it a
reality.”
Military
leaders around the world? They have
“allowed” us to move forward with this concept. Since when did U.S.
Navy officials look to foreign officials and leaders for guidance on
what to do about U.S. national security? It apparently started sometime
after the decline from 594 Navy ships under President Reagan, who
rejected UNCLOS, to only 276 today. We are headed down to only 180
ships in 17 years..."
More:
Economist
says U.S. subprime mortgage crisis has limited impact on China
The
Bottom Line: China is the world's new superpower.
- Ninjas Rob Pennsylvania Gas Station
Pennsylvania (Fox) - "A
Pennsylvania robbery turned into a bad kung fu movie last weekend when
two women in ninja attire robbed a gas station of lottery tickets,
cigarettes and cash, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported.
The
two women walked into the Sunoco station early Saturday armed with a
samurai sword and a dagger, respectively, the paper reported. They
allegedly tied up a female clerk, grabbed the loot and fled. The
robbery was captured on security video.
Click here to watch the video.
The swarthy 'ninjas' were
dressed all in black except for white gloves. Police have made no
arrests in the case..."
The
Bottom Line: Looks like I'll have to make a new section
covering the proper means of preparedness for the eventual Ninja
Attack. (...joke)
Tuesday, September 25th, 2007
- Fed
rate cut sparks recession fear
United Kingdom (The Standard) - "The US Federal Reserve's move last week to cut
key interest rates by a larger-than-expected 50 basis points came as a
pleasant surprise for financial markets, but it also intensified
concerns that the world's largest economy may be facing a risk of a
sharp slowdown or even a recession.
Some economists say that
with the
Fed signaling it has become more worried about the negative effects of
subprime problems on the economy it is likely to allow a cycle of rate
cuts in the event of a slowdown.
Morgan
Stanley Asia chairman
Stephen Roach said on Friday there was a 40-45 percent chance a
recession will occur in the United States next year, led by a housing
market downturn and the subprime problem.
China
International
Capital Corp economist Ha Jiming said: "The Fed action [last week]
signals that it is deeply worried about the negative consequences of
the subprime mortgage crisis, in particular regarding the weak housing
market that could affect consumption and growth in general."
While
the US economy enjoyed relatively solid growth in the second quarter,
with strong business investment and private consumption, which remained
robust, new data have indicated a worsening in residential investment
and labor market conditions.
"The
main risk, related to the
spread of credit market turmoil and further housing market
deterioration, seems to have increased. Despite high labor cost,
inflationary pressure is moderate, providing room for further interest
rate cuts," Ha said.
He
predicts the Fed will cut the benchmark
lending rate by 25 basis points next month, and believes monetary
policy easing should reduce the likelihood of recession. A recession is
defined as negative economic growth for two consecutive quarters.
Some
economists say that, while there is considerable risk to the US
economic outlook, economic data so far, have been sanguine and do not
indicate a looming recession.
"The
data so far have been upbeat
and the problem with financial crises such as the credit crisis is that
the impact becomes only clear over time," said Frederic Neumann, HSBC
Asia economist. "In that sense, the Fed's rate cut was somewhat
preemptive without being based on clear economic evidence, but it is
rather trying to forestall the possibility that the US economy would
slow down."
Neumann
expects at least one more interest rate cut this year..."
More:
Swiss
stocks guru warns of US recession
Premier Says France Bankrupt
$3400
Gold - pipe dream or possibility?
Paulson
tells U.S. Congress current debt ceiling will be hit on Oct. 1
What
the big banks aren't telling you -- yet
Ease
of forex swaps vanishes in rush for cash
The
Bank loses a game of chicken
73,000
wordkers walk in nationwide GM strike
Bullion
rise, reserves in focus as gold miners meet
Deutsche
Bank debt hit may be $2.4 bln: source
The
Bottom Line:
Dump your cash into something useful and quick. "Equity" no
longer
means something you can resell for profit. It means something you
own
that will make your life easier.
- Russia warns against Iran war
Moscow
(spacewar.com) - "Russia expressed apprehension
Tuesday over the
possibility of a war with Iran evoked by French Foreign Minister
Bernard Kouchner, who again urged tougher sanctions to halt Tehran's
nuclear programme.
Foreign Minister Sergei
Lavrov emphasised Russia's "concern" over
"multiple reports that military action against Iran is being seriously
considered. It's hard to imagine what that could do to the region."
Kouchner, on a visit to Russia, meanwhile called for "working on
precise sanctions" and added that France and Russia had differences on
the issue.
However, the French foreign minister underlined that "everything should
be done to avoid war."
"War is the worst that could happen," he said. "Everything should be
done to avoid war. We have to negotiate, negotiate, negotiate --
without cease, without rebuff."
His comments appeared aimed at quieting an uproar over his statement
Sunday that the world should prepare for a possible war with Iran -- a
warning Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dismissed Tuesday as
fanciful.
Kouchner blamed the media for distorting his statement that "we have to
prepare for the worst, and the worst is war."
"As usual with journalists, they take one phrase and you don't know
what came after," he told Russia's Echo of Moscow radio late Tuesday.
"They're saying: Bernard Kouchner wants war. But it's not true. It's a
manipulation. I don't want war, I want peace."
The Russian and French ministers met ahead of a UN Security Council
meeting on Friday that may impose new sanctions against Tehran for its
controversial uranium enrichment activity.
UN chief Ban Ki-moon on Tuesday urged dialogue to resolve the impasse
and reiterated a plea to Tehran to stop enriching uranium..."
The
Bottom Line: Stern words of warning.
- The new British empire? UK plans
to annex south Atlantic
London (The Guardian) - "Britain is
preparing territorial claims on tens of thousands of square
miles of the Atlantic Ocean floor around the Falklands, Ascension
Island and Rockall in the hope of annexing potentially lucrative gas,
mineral and oil fields, the Guardian has learned.
The UK claims, to
be lodged at the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf,
exploit a novel legal approach that is transforming the international
politics of underwater prospecting.
Britain is accelerating
its
process of submitting applications to the UN - which is fraught with
diplomatic sensitivities, not least with Argentina - before an
international deadline for registering interests.
Relying on detailed
geological and geophysical surveys by scientists
and hydrographers, any state can delineate a new "continental shelf
outer limit" that can extend up to 350 miles from its shoreline. Data
has been collected for most of Britain's submissions and Chris
Carleton, head of the law of the sea division at the UK Hydrographic
Office and an international expert on the process, said preliminary
talks on Rockall are being held in Reykjavik, Iceland, next week.
Mr
Carleton believes the Falklands claim has the most potential for
acrimonious political fallout. Britain and Argentina fought over the
islands 25 years ago, and the value of the oil under the sea in the
region is understood to be immense: seismic tests suggest there could
be up to 60m barrels under the ocean floor.
Britain has been
granted licences for exploratory drilling around the islands within the
normal 200-mile exploration limit and any new claim to UNCLCS would
extend territorial rights further into the Atlantic.
"It would be
beyond the 200-mile limit but less than 350 miles," said Mr Carleton,
who is involved in preparing the submission. "It effectively joins up
the area around South Georgia to the Falklands. It's a claim but how
it's handled has not been decided yet. The Argentinians will say it's
not ours to claim. It's all a bit tricky."
Martin Pratt, director
of research at Durham University's international boundaries research
unit, added: "The Russians may be claiming the Arctic but the UK is
claiming a large chunk of the Atlantic. Some states might ask why a big
power is entitled to huge stretches of the ocean's resources thousands
of miles away from its land, but that's the way the law is."
Because
of the sensitivities - earlier this year Buenos Aires scrapped a 1995
agreement with the UK to share any oil found in the adjacent waters -
the first formal application from the UK is likely to centre on
Ascension.
The volcanic island,
1,000 miles from the African
mainland, sits just to one side of the mid-Atlantic ridge. No gas or
oil is likely to be found below the surrounding waters but there could
be significant mineral deposits on the ocean floor.
Talks have
already begun between Ireland, Iceland and Denmark for the division of
rights far out into the north Atlantic. It includes the island of
Rockall and the sub-sea Hatton ridge. The competing claims are nowhere
near final resolution although Ireland and the UK have agreed a common
boundary..."
The
Bottom Line: This resource claiming is going to get ugly
and quick.
Monday, September 24th, 2007
- Dollar
dips to 15-year low as slide extends
TOKYO (Reuters) - "The dollar dipped
to a 15-year low against a
basket of currencies on Monday and hovered near a record low against
the euro as investors shrugged off more gripes about the single
currency's strength from French officials.
Activity was subdued with
financial markets in Tokyo, Asia's top
currency trading centre, closed for a national holiday. Markets in
South Korea and Taiwan were also shut for holidays.
Market players are
keeping a close eye on whether the dollar breaks
the all-time low of 78.19 struck on its trade-weighted index in 1992, a
level that analysts said would provide a key test of whether the U.S.
currency's sell-off deepens or pauses.
The dollar index slipped
to a 15-year low of 78.398 and was down 0.1 percent from late U.S.
trade on Friday at 78.480.
"It's a general sentiment
continuation of dollar weakness," said a senior currency trader at a
European bank in Singapore.
The retreat in the dollar
index came as the euro edged up slightly
to $1.4100 and climbed as high as $1.4118, just shy of the record peak
of $1.4121 hit on Friday on trading platform EBS.
The Federal Reserve's
50-basis point cut in overnight rates last
week to 4.75 percent stirred expectations for even more monetary easing
that would erode the dollar's interest rate appeal compared with the
euro and higher-yielding currencies.
The
euro's climb to an all-time high above $1.41 has stirred worries
about its potential hit to European exports and prompted more criticism
of the European Central Bank by the government of French President
Nicolas Sarkozy..."
More:
Gold
near 28-year peak, targets new highs
Now, Wall St. wonders about inflation
Union
sets strike deadline at GM
Investors watch out for
signs of inflation
Israel asks U.S.
foreign aid be paid in EUROS
Bernanke Has
Snookered Us All
The
Bottom Line: Doh!
- Cheney mulled Israeli strike on
Iran: Newsweek
WASHINGTON
(Reuters) - "Vice President Dick Cheney had at one point
considered asking Israel to launch limited missile strikes at an
Iranian nuclear site to provoke a retaliation, Newsweek magazine
reported on Sunday.
The news comes amid
reports that Israel launched an air strike against Syria this month
over a suspected nuclear site.
Citing two unidentified
sources, Newsweek said former Cheney Middle
East adviser David Wurmser told a small group several months ago that
Cheney was considering asking Israel to strike the Iranian nuclear site
at Natanz.
A military response by
Iran could give Washington an excuse to then launch airstrikes of its
own, Newsweek said.
Wurmser's wife, Meyrav
Wurmser of the neoconservative Hudson Institute think tank, told
Newsweek the claims were untrue.
Wurmser left Cheney's
office last month, the magazine reported. The
steady departure of neoconservative hawks from the administration has
also helped tilt the balance against war, it said.
Washington has been
pursuing diplomatic efforts to persuade Iran to
alter its nuclear program. It has refused to take military options off
the table, even U.S. resources are taxed by having 169,000 troops in
Iraq.
Although some
intelligence sources say Iran is years away from
nuclear capability, Israel believes that military action may be
necessary as early as 2008, Newsweek said.
Israel has declined to comment on the reported air strike, while
Syria has denied receiving North Korean nuclear aid and said it could
retaliate for the September 6 violation of its territory..."
More:
US
says Iran smuggling missiles to Iraq
Brzezinski:
U.S. in danger of 'stampeding' to war with Iran
The
Bottom Line: War with Iran? No way, not in a million
years... note the sarcasm.
- Oil companies cautious as winds
blow in U.S. Gulf
NEW YORK (Reuters) - "Recent
accidents and spills have made the U.S.
energy industry more risk-averse in the face of potential hurricanes,
leading to more extensive precautionary shutdowns than in the past and
adding to supply disruptions during hurricane season.
This week a cluster of
wind squalls that for a time threatened to
form into a storm triggered mass evacuations of offshore oil rigs and
shut nearly 63 percent of the Gulf's crude oil output.
The shutdown was the
largest in the Gulf of Mexico since 2005 when
massive hurricanes Katrina and Rita barreled across the offshore rigs
and into the coast, inflicting billions of dollars in damage. Yet by
Friday, little damage was expected and companies were already preparing
to resume production.
"Most companies are just
hypersensitive these days about protecting
their employees," said Jim Ritterbusch, president of Ritterbusch and
Associates. "It's not just because they want to keep good workers, but
it is also an immense public relations issue at the moment."
A deadly explosion at
BP's oil refinery in Texas in 2005 which
killed 15 workers and an oil spill at its field in Alaska in 2006 had
focused the industry to improve its record on safety and the
environment.
Oil industry association
the American Petroleum Institute said
companies were particularly concerned with storm safety in the Gulf of
Mexico after the devastating storms of 2005.
"It's an individual
company decision but after Rita and Katrina we
had a series of discussions and dialogues about best practices and I'd
expect them to put those to use," said John Felmy, API director.
He
added that a recent hurricane, Humberto, which quickly formed in
the Gulf of Mexico in mid-September and knocked out three oil
refineries, was also fresh on the industry's mind..."
The
Bottom Line: Don't cry over spilled Oil... or do; I forget
which.
Sunday, September 23rd, 2007
- Canada's
Dollar Nears Parity on U.S. Weakness, Commodity Surge
Canada
(Bloomberg) -- Canada's dollar rose, trading almost
equal to the U.S. dollar for the first time in 31 years, as
climbing commodity prices boosted the outlook for the world's
eighth-biggest economy.
The currency reached as
high as 99.99 U.S. cents, and hasn't
equaled $1 since November 1976, when Pierre Trudeau was Canada's
prime minister. Gold rose to a 27-year high today as the U.S.
dollar sank to a record low against the euro, spurring demand for
alternative investments. Crude oil set a record high yesterday.
``I don't see any barrier
in the way of parity now,'' said
Toronto-based James Dutkiewicz, who manages C$5 billion in fixed-
income assets at CI Investments Inc., Canada's second-largest
mutual fund manger. ``This is a story of U.S. dollar weakness,
the commodity boom, and our unparalleled fiscal situation among
the Group of Seven countries.''
Canada's dollar climbed
1.4 percent to 99.84 U.S. cents at
9:49 a.m. in Toronto, and gained against another 15 major
currencies.
So-called option barriers
are in place at the $1 level,
``which the currency has to surpass before reaching parity,''
said David Bradley, director of currency trading at Scotia
Capital Inc. in Toronto. ``My sense is that we'll get there in
the next 24 hours. Sentiment is very strong for the Canadian
dollar. Everything is in place for the Canadian dollar to
continue to appreciate.''
Canadian Commodities
Canada has benefited from
rising demand for copper, gold,
wheat and oil from the U.S. and from emerging economies such as
India and China. The country is the world's largest producer of
uranium, the second-biggest exporter of natural gas, and sits on
the largest pool of oil reserves outside the Middle East. Canada
is also the second-largest exporter of wheat, which rose to a
record this month.
Canada's economy is set
to expand 2.5 percent this year,
outperforming the U.S. for the first time in five years,
according to a Bloomberg survey this month.
Rising tax revenue and
energy royalties have allowed the
Canadian government to post 10 straight annual budget surpluses,
the only country among the Group of Seven nations with a balanced
account. Canada's total consolidated revenue rose 25 percent
during the past five years to C$601.26 billion.
The G-7 includes the
U.S., Japan, Germany, the U.K., France,
Italy and Canada.
Selling U.S. Dollars
Traders sold U.S. dollars
today, driving the currency weaker
than $1.4 per euro for the first time, on speculation the Federal
Reserve will continue to reduce interest rates, dimming the
allure of U.S. assets. The U.S. dollar fell today against 15 of
16 major currencies tracked by Bloomberg.
While the Fed cut its
benchmark rate by half a percentage
point on Sept. 18 to 4.75 percent to revive growth, Canada's
central bank raised rates in July and may increase them again
this year to stem inflation, futures contracts show. Canada's key
rate is 4.5 percent.
The yield on the
benchmark two-year Canadian government bond
rose 4 basis points, or 0.04 percentage point, to 4.28 percent.
The price of the 3.75 percent security maturing in June 2009 fell
7 cents to C$99.14. Bond yields move inversely to prices.
Canada's rising bond
yields are also drawing investors to
the currency. The nation's two-year bond yields 26 basis points
more than the comparable-maturity U.S. Treasury, close to the
widest difference since 2004..."
More:
The
Great Inflation Mystery, Still Unsolved
Are we headed for an epic bear market?
HSBC closes US
sub-prime division
The
Bottom Line: The only consensus about the coming economic
storm is "we don't know exactly when or how". That and it's a
matter of "when", not "if".
- Agriculture in a post-oil economy
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - "The decline
in the world’s oil supply offers no sudden dramatic event
that would appeal to the writer of “apocalyptic” science fiction: no
mushroom clouds, no flying saucers, no giant meteorites.
The future will be just like today, only
tougher. Oil depletion is
basically just a matter of overpopulation — too many people and not
enough resources.
The most serious consequence will be a
lack of food. The problem of oil
therefore leads, in an apparently mundane fashion, to the problem of
farming.
To what extent could food be produced in
a world without fossil fuels?
In the year 2000, humanity consumed about 30 billion barrels of oil,
but the supply is starting to run out; without oil and natural gas,
there will be no fuel, no asphalt, no plastics, no chemical fertilizer.
Most people in modern industrial civilization live on food that was
bought from a local supermarket, but such food will not always be
available. Agriculture in the future will be largely a “family affair”:
without motorized vehicles, food will have to be produced not far from
where it was consumed. But what crops should be grown? How much land
would be needed? Where could people be supported by such methods of
agriculture?
...
...
...
When Will Mechanical Agriculture Be Abandoned?
One way of determining when oil-based
agriculture will be abandoned is
strictly economic: when it costs farmers more money to use machinery
than to use hand tools, they will go back to hand tools. In the study
of Mexican labor mentioned by Pimentel, “a total of 1,144 hours of
labor was required to raise a hectare of corn.” Pimentel then compares
that labor with the mechanized corn production in the United States,
telling us that “600 liters of oil equivalents [for fuel, fertilizer,
and pesticides] are required to cultivate 1 ha of corn.” The ratio of
hours to liters therefore seems to be approximately 2:1.
Modern grain-corn production in the US,
however, results in yields of
about 6,000 kg/ha, about 3 times as great as in the Mexican example. If
we include that factor of higher yield, the previous 2:1 ratio of
hours/liters must really be regarded as 6:1.
To discover whether mechanization is
cost-effective, we must insert a
number for hourly wage. If the laborer is self-employed, however, the
figure for hourly wage seems purely imaginary: If costs are rising, for
example, can the laborers not simply pay themselves less? Only to a
certain degree. The laborer’s wage is often as little as it takes to
keep body and soul together, but anything less than that subsistence
wage would make farming impossible.
The rise in the price of fuel, combined
with the hourly wage, then,
determines the cut-off point for mechanized labor. When farmers pay
themselves a certain amount for 6 hours of work, but the price of fuel
is equal to that amount, the 6:1 ratio has been reached, and it would
be reasonable for the farmer to give up mechanization.
Two other factors must be included if we
are to compare manual labor
with mechanization. Capital costs are higher with mechanization: a
tractor must be paid for, there are repairs to consider, and eventually
the tractor must be replaced. For now, however, let us assume that the
laborer is working with a minimum of equipment. Secondly, in spite of
what was said above about subsistence wages, farming income is higher
in some countries than in others, and the same can be said of fuel
costs. Farmers in Mexico, with high fuel costs and low wages, might be
inclined to abandon mechanization sooner than farmers in the United
States.
Food, of course, can also be produced
with the labor of horses or oxen,
and in fact many hours of human labor can thereby by saved. Even if
animals are fed only on forage, however, a good deal of land is needed
for that purpose. It is also questionable whether large numbers of
horses or oxen could be bred and distributed in the next few decades.
There is also the question of “alternative energy,” in the sense of
solutions involving advanced technology, but such innovations would
probably serve little purpose without fossil fuels to provided at least
an infrastructure [7,8].
What will be the price of gasoline in a
few years’ time? (“Current
dollars” are used here; it is misleading to speak of
“inflation-adjusted energy prices,” since it is mainly energy shortages
that cause inflation in the first place [3].) US gasoline prices
increased over the quarter-century before 2003 only at the same rate as
the median income [16], with the exception of some small deviations
during periods of warfare. In recent years, however, prices have risen
by 18% per year [6]. With such a growth trend, a gallon of US gasoline
will cost $60 in 2025, and $140 in 2030, although number-juggling of
that sort soon becomes highly speculative.
For the sake of a thought-experiment,
however, we might take a closer
look at those price projections. Let us recall the 6:1 ratio of
hours-versus-liters at which it is no longer cost-effective to use
mechanization. A cost of $140/gallon in 2030 would equal $36/liter. If
6 hours of labor should also happen to cost $36, a sensible farmer
would decide to give up mechanization at that point. In countries
poorer than the US, that cut-off point would actually arrive well
before the year 2030.
The other way of estimating a cut-off
date for oil-based agriculture,
of course, is to look at predictions of the decline in global oil
production. According to the latest annual report of BP Global [1],
“proved reserves” are only 1.2 trillion barrels (excluding a little
from Canadian tar sands), although that figure inches up slightly from
one annual report to another. A trillion barrels of oil is not enough
to stretch more than a few decades. A continuation of an 18% annual
increase in the cost of gasoline may seem absurd, but that figure
closely matches the likely bell curve for global oil production: a
decline from 30 billion barrels (5 barrels per person) in the year 2000
to 11 billion barrels (1 barrel per person) in 2030 would be an average
annual decrease of 22%. It is not only gasoline prices and estimated
oil reserves that have an ominous chronological relationship: it is
surely not merely coincidental that there has recently been a spate of
legislation, in several countries, for ethanol and other biofuels, in
spite of the economic and ecological absurdity of such forms of
“alternative energy.”.."
The
Bottom Line: The unsustainable population levels of
mankind seem like they will drop back down to "managable" levels in the
near future. Much thanks to our friend Rzero for this find.
His blog can be found here.
- Ahmadinejad warns against attack
NEW YORK (BBC) - "Iran's President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has issued a tough warning to any country
considering an attack on Iran.
He said Iran's forces were just for defence, but that anybody who
attacked would experience nothing but regret.
He urged those he called the occupiers in the region -
an apparent reference to the US and its allies in Iraq - to admit
defeat and withdraw their troops.
Mr Ahmadinejad was speaking at a huge annual military parade marking
the anniversary of the Iran-Iraq War.
On display at the parade was Iran's latest military hardware, including
new long-range missiles and Saeqeh fighter jets.
According to the Associated Press news agency some of
the lorries carrying Iranian missiles bore anti-US and anti-Israeli
slogans.
"Those who prevented Iran, at the height of the [1980-88
Iran-Iraq] war from getting even barbed wire must see now that all the
equipment on display today has been built by the mighty hands and
brains of experts at Iran's armed forces," Mr Ahmadinejad said.
"Learn lessons from your past
mistakes. Don't repeat your
mistakes," he added..."
The
Bottom Line: See, even the jackass guy from Iran knows the
attack is coming.
Back to News
|
 |
|